AMD A10 6800 CPU - "AMD A10 6800 CPU against the AMD FX 4300 CPU. AMD A10 6800 is clocked at 4100Mhz and AMD FX 4300 is clocked at 3800Mhz. AMD A10 6800 is the Richland APU while the AMD FX 4300 is Verisha. AMD A10 6800 has the GPU embedded into the AMD A10 6880 is the HD 8670D at 844Mhz with 384 Stream Processors. Benchmarks for testing the AMD A10 6800 and AMD FX 4300 are:- Divx, Povray, Sysmark 2012, Windows Media Encoder, Dragon Age and World of Warcraft."
AMD CPU featuring ALL of the latest News and Reviews of the newest AMD CPU Technology. We will be featuring all of the Technology, Specifications and useful Information about the Newest AMD CPU.
Thursday, 20 June 2013
Wednesday, 12 June 2013
AMD FX 9590 AND AMD FX 9370 CPU - "AMD has released some powerful cpu over the years and the AMD FX Piledriver and AMD FX Bulldozer range of cpu more than improves on the previous range. You will find Specifications, CPU Technology, CPU Clock Speed, CPU Turbo Clock Speed, CPU Max Turbo Clock Speed, Number of CPU Cores and the amount of Level 3 Cache. We feature new information which has come to our attention of the AMD FX 9590 and AMD FX 9370 which looks very interesting."
Tuesday, 11 June 2013
FIND MORE CPU REVIEWS - "This review was about showing if there was a clear performance advantage for Quad Core over Dual Core Processors using a mixture of benchmarks from Synthetic to real Games. The reason we are mostly comparing the AMD Athlon II X4 645 to the AMD Athlon II X2 265 is because we wanted to know even if the Athlon II X2 is clocked 20% faster than the AMD Athlon II X4 645 would it offer anywhere near the same performance. The AMD Athlon II X4 645 finishes 41% faster than the AMD Athlon II X2 265 which is clocked 7% faster for an impressive early win for the AMD Athlon II X4 645. Synthetic Benchmarks have their place but I am under the impression that what my readers want is to show how Quad Core Performance with Games is compared to Dual Core. With real games the AMD Athlon II X4 645 finishes 21% faster than the AMD Athlon II X2 265. The AMD Athlon II X4 645 when compared to the AMD Athlon II X2 255 which is clocked at 3.1Ghz the AMD Athlon II X4 645 is 27% faster. Right now it would appear that Games software is not taking full advantage of Quad Core but in the future this will change so it's better to get a Quad Core Processor rather than a Dual Core Processor. The problem with Quad Core is the price which is sometimes over twice that of Dual Core processors for the same Clock Speed. Quad Core is for the future so it makes no sense to get a Dual Core Processor especially with the excellent AMD Phenom II Quad Core Processors which are much better than even the AMD Athlon II X4 645."